Elections Commission Regular Meeting

Wednesday, October 16, 2024

In this page:

    Overview

    Video link to this meeting and transcript is available below.

    Agenda

    1. 1. Call to Order & Roll Call

      The San Francisco Elections Commission acknowledges that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. As the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. As guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland.  We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors and relatives of the Ramaytush Community and affirming their sovereign rights as First Peoples.

    2. 2. General Public Comment

      Public comment on any issue within the Elections Commission’s general jurisdiction that is not covered by another item on this agenda.

    3. 3. Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes

      Discussion and possible action on previous Elections Commission meeting minutes. 

    4. 4. Director's Report

      Discussion and possible action regarding the October 2024 Director’s Report. 

    5. 5. Commissioners' Reports

      Discussion and possible action on Commissioners’ reports for topics not covered by another item on this agenda: Meetings with public officials; oversight and observation activities; long-range planning for Commission activities and areas of study; proposed legislation which affects elections; others.

    6. 6. Cast Vote Records Policy

      Discussion and possible action on the San Francisco Elections Commission’s potential position on state-based policy or legislative changes affecting San Francisco’s practice of releasing cast vote records prior to election certification.

      History of the Bill

      Final Version of the Bill

    7. 7. Agenda Items for Future Meetings

      Discussion and possible action regarding items for future agendas.  

    8. 8. Adjournment

    Date & Time

    Wednesday, October 16, 2024
    6:00 pm to 9:00 pm

    City Hall, Room 408

    1 Dr. Carlton B Goodlett Place
    San Francisco, CA 94102
    View location on google maps

    Online

    Webinar number (access code): 2660 686 1266
    Webinar password: cqVPc6J9d9A (27872659 when dialing from a video system)
    Join the meeting

    Phone

    Access code: ### TBD
    Event password: #### TBD (for phones only)

    Elections Commission October 16, 2024 meeting video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_bbTVmkAJA

     

    welcome everyone to the October 16th 2024 regular meeting of the San

    Francisco elections commission I'm the president Robin Stone The Time Is Now 6 pm and I call the meeting to order

    before we proceed further I'd like to ask commission secretary Marissa Davis to briefly explain some procedures for

    participating in today's meeting thank you president Stone the minutes of this meeting will

    reflect that this meeting is being held in person city hall room 408 one Dr

    Carlton B goodlet Place San Francisco California 94102 and remotely via webx as

    authorized by the elections commission's February 15 2023 vote members of the

    public May attend the meeting to observe and provide public comment either at the physical meeting location or remotely

    details and instructions for par participating remotely are listed on the commission website and on today's

    meeting agenda public comment will be available on each item on this agenda

    each member of the public will be allowed three minutes to speak six minutes if you're on the line with an

    interpreter when providing public comment you are encouraged to state your name clearly once your three minutes

    have expired staff will thank you and you will be muted please direct your comments to the entire commission and

    not to a specific commissioner when joining by phone you will hear a beep when you are connected to the meeting

    you will be automatically muted and in listening mode only to make public comment dial Star

    three to raise your hand when your item of Interest comes up you will be added to the public comment line you will hear

    you have raised your hand to ask a question please wait until the host calls on you the line will be silent as

    you wait your turn to speak if at any time you change your mind and wish to withdraw yourself from public comment

    line press star three again you will hear the system say you have lowered your hand when joining by WebEx or web

    browser make sure your the participant side panel is showing at the bottom of

    the list attendees is a small button or icon that looks like a hand press the hand icon to raise your hand you will be

    unmuted when it is time for you to comment when you are done with your comment click the hand icon again to

    lower your hand in addition to participating in real time interested persons are encouraged to participate in

    this meeting by submitting public comment in writing by 12m on the day of this meeting to

    elections. commission at sfgov.org it will be shared with the commission after

    this meeting has concluded and will be included as part of the official meeting file thank you president

    Stone thank you secretary Davis will you please proceed for please proceed with item one commission roll call President

    Stone present vice president Parker here commissioner bernh holes here

    commissioner D commissioner loli here commissioner Wong here president stone with six

    members present and accounted for you have a quorum the thank you secretary Davis the

    San Francisco elections commission acknowledges that we are on the unseated ancestral homeland of theu shalone who

    are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula as the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance

    with their Traditions the remsh alone have never seed lost nor forgotten their responsibilities as caretakers of this

    place as well as for All Peoples who reside in their traditional territory as guests we recognize that we benefit from

    living and working on their traditional Homeland we wish to pay respects by acknowledging the ancestors and relatives of the ritish community and

    affirming their Sovereign rights as first peoples that closes agenda item number one let's move to agenda item

    number two general public comment public comment on any issue within the elections Commission General

    jurisdiction that is not covered by another item on this

    agenda Mr Turner are you there oh we actually have someone in person first so let's hold on Mr Turner and um

    we will take public comment in person just bear with us for one moment

    thank you

    you I can also do it if it's easier

    okay you may begin thank you Commissioners well John

    I guess I'm the last man standing huh about last year I'm sure you all

    know that John just about lost his job it was over a card game seems that there

    was a big card game and a whole bunch of politicians were playing and John was

    dealing and he took the cards and went in the back room then he came out and he said I'm

    ready to deal they said let's cut the deck I said no you don't get to do that

    so I DT the cards out and surprisingly mayor breed won the mayor's race you

    know what that's exactly what we have going on in the Department of Elections we have a proprietary algorithm we don't

    know how they count our votes that is so caveman in Tech San Francisco John

    orence has been keeping that in place for 20 years for 20 years he's been

    saying he's not smart enough to figure out how to do open- Source voting we're

    not smart enough as a city to do uh to to do rank Choice voting it's absolutely

    Preposterous the uh you missed out last year uh my my comments are to the public

    uh not particularly to you all and I you're a fascinating group you talk about a a real mixup

    a buddy of mine created you Matt Gonzales I I always uh thought that that

    was a real mix of seven there that you should always have a wild cat in from at

    least one of the positions it's getting to where the uh uh the whole commission

    though is uh pretty much lock step with orang and you you've got a system in San

    Francisco that's fixed and that's nothing new are any of you old enough to remember ballots in the bay

    I mean that's not a song that's a reality the uh we were uh that's not the

    worst thing happened that election worst thing happened that election was a grandmother and her grandchildren got

    burned to death they were pole workers she was she was ready to testify against

    Willie Brown and suddenly there was a mysterious fire and she died the her uh

    relatives got $10 million uh started out as $5 million to pay for her death there

    was nothing was was ever proven about it well he said I'll never pay it and he didn't uh Nome had to sell school

    property to pay it is that 30 seconds or is that the it was 30 seconds long thir

    three minutes is a long time I can tell you a bunch of stories here my name is H Brown I'm a retired reform school

    teacher got a masters from Clemson uh I taught from South Carolina to San

    Francisco I taught kids that killed their parents I taught kids that killed cops and did it successfully reform

    works and revenge does not thank

    you let's move to public comment

    online Mr Turner are you

    there Mr Turner

    Mr

    Turner Mr

    Turner is he does he still have his hand raised can you hear me yes I see him now

    thank you um hello uh Commissioners my name is name is Brent Turner I'm here to

    make comment on uh a link that I sent into the uh commission today um

    regarding Mississippi and uh the fact that Mississippi in New Hampshire has now adopted and deployed open source

    voting systems of course we know that most of the work was done here in San Francisco but unfortunately blocked by

    John arst and so again we want to remind the commission that this is probably the most intense civil rights matter of our

    time and the fact that has failed to lead is as well as California I think is

    now an obvious embarrassment to all of us um the uh article I sent begs a

    question why is Mississippi ahead of California when it comes to election system technology and I think the issue

    falls upon the lap of John arnst and also Los Angeles who if we remember was

    allocated $300 million to create an open source voting machine that $300 million

    is gone and they still don't have an open source voting machine they were last seen in conference with oset and

    others that enjoy Shenanigans regarding elections but we're we're we don't think

    it's funny and and we're saddened by it so I just wanted to have the elections commission take a look at that article

    and ask the question why is Mississippi ahead of San Francisco and California

    when it comes to Next Generation voting systems and so you did all the work Tom

    Amano started it um uh this is in the name of the med grever family people

    that have given their lives for this issue and I think we should pay pay attention to it thank you again for your

    time and your efforts here thank you thank you

    there are no other hands raised thank you secretary Davis that closes agenda item number two let's move to to item

    number three approval of previous meeting minutes discussion and possible action on previous elections commission

    meeting minutes yes vice president

    Parker uh thank you president Stone um I just had one small correction and and that was the correction that I offered

    for the August minutes last month was not included in these minutes it only mentioned um some other

    Corrections thank

    you yes commissioner D um so I had sent in uh shared with um

    with President Stone and uh secretary Davis some um typos and uh some other

    more substantive changes um so one was

    It was obviously a special meeting at a special time last meeting uh I had a

    different order for the motions and seconds so um perhaps secretary Davis

    can double check those and then I just added some uh

    my online connection to my draft just went down so I just added some clarifications to

    the discussion around SB 1328 uh since the

    um most of the discussion was not on 1328 itself but on the proposed amendment that didn't actually happen so

    uh as I put in some clarifying comments about that um as well as I thought it

    was important to provide some content Tex to uh the public commenter the commissioner from the Alam County

    elections that um to provide the context of of why she was um speaking to the

    commission and the fact that she had U mentioned that there were three elections that were affected by the vote

    tabulation error um and if the cast vote records had not been released that they

    would not have been discovered in a timely fashion so just some minor

    clarifications thank you commissioner D any other

    comments I'll add a comment um I would like to review the edits that

    commissioner D has proposed sounds like they're more than just typos and I haven't had the chance to review them so

    um I would not like to move forward with these minutes um until the next meeting and I've had the chance to review her

    edits is everyone okay with that okay any other

    comments okay thank you vice president Parker and commissioner D let's move to public

    comment there is another commenter in person

    just one

    moment go ahead the uh city attorney's appoin he has a an interesting history

    for her boss um he got right out of Harvard and went into business with a

    guy named Tim dick and who was into Russian oil uh moving it around they

    created a an agency a PR agency uh to uh

    go after uh political advertising they had the head of the Christian Coalition

    on it uh un unbelievable ad so what happened was excuse me um just it's

    related it's I'm I'm a Storyteller let me tie it together yeah thank you so what happened was the city appointees

    appointing authority uh uh got some work with uh George W uh bush in the 2000 uh

    campaign against Gore and wrote progr s to train his top staff and could have

    made the difference in Florida so our City attorney elected a bush there's a

    just on a side there the uh uh the uh on the Dominion machines there's a story

    told John maybe you can verify it at the airport the Dominion representative said that he had San Francisco machines wired

    I I don't know what that means we are uh this agenda item is spefic spefically about the meeting minutes um is there

    anything is there a comment you'd like to make about the meeting minutes uh no ma'am I don't I don't mean to be rude

    I'm just grabbing every chance I can here thank you for listening to when you give comment um uh on the agenda

    items the meeting what somebody said that that they copied what they said wrong they misinterpreted it I mean that

    happens all the time on the phone or computer when you're talking did did did somebody say that they changed what they

    said in the meeting minutes is that against the law no thank thank you so much for your comment if you'd like to

    make a a comment on a future agenda thank you so much are there any other public

    commenters any online thank you secretary Davis that closes agenda item number three let's

    move to agenda item number four director's report discussion and possible action regarding the October 2024 director's report I'll hand it to

    director thank you president Stone uh I can take questions on the report just a few items though so next Monday is the

    deadline to register to vote and I'm sorry is what for what register to vote

    thank you and have a about mailed to a a registered voter after next Monday

    people people can still register but they have to do so in person uh so next Monday is a key date if someone wants to

    register needs to register update the registration information and have about mailed to them uh right now we have

    around 517,000 registered voters in San Francisco which is the second highest we've had in in the city's history uh so

    far we've received around 23,000 ballots back which is actually about half of

    what we expected to have at this point if not actually less than half so it's it's been a bit light as far as the

    turnout's been is concerned uh our phone bank has been steady but not overly busy

    we've received around 4,000 phone calls since the middle of September which is when we mailed the overseas

    ballots and um you know right now everything as far as our plan is concerned has been moving forward as as

    we would like uh there's no resource issues uh and uh we have enough pow

    workers already for this um election we have enough Personnel that we've uh

    brought into the department and will'll bring in to the department so right now everything's looking really good for this election and I can take any

    questions from from the thank you thank you director ARS take commissioner question

    questions yes vice president Parker um thank you as usual for the

    detailed report um let's see um I have a a few notes I'll just start with a few

    of the comments and then um and then end with a couple of questions um

    I this is maybe more for the public um in your first section I always uh really appreciate the detail and transparency

    around the processes the department uses around the elections um and specifically

    around the ballot signature image capture process which I think is interesting I just wanted to encourage the public to read the detail about how

    this works on the website um on the securing and protecting the Integrity of the elections um because it also

    describes the training and guidelines and regulations that the staff is all following and I think

    as so many people are concerned to make sure that our election is secure and and

    um verified and all that I just there's so much information so I want to encourage the public to look at that um and there's also the public access to

    the whole thing as you described in your report um I really loved the voter

    turnout page and all the charts on that um that was really interesting to look at um and you know as you're talking you

    just mentioned the the kind of the record um registration numbers we have our second and highest in history it was

    also just um this is more Reflection from the past when I was looking at those charts is that um the last

    presidential in 2020 we had an 86% turnout that year right and that that

    was the highest in like 20s something years and before that it was only that high in like the 30s to the 60s so a

    long time ago so I know that there are a lot of inputs that get us to that um that turnout number you know including

    Community groups and Advocates and things like that um but I know the department also plays a role in that and so it was just it was nice to see it in

    a visible way um through the charts and the number so um thank you I so just

    wanted to acknowledge that um let's see just would you mind um uh Mr Brown would

    you mind sorry would you mind sitting in the sure we can speak louder thank you

    so much sorry vice president no problem no problem um let's see um

    I also had um really glad to hear about that expanded team to answer the calls thank

    you for that um I was also glad to read about the expanded training on managing potential disturbances at polling places

    and the administration of the non-citizen voting uh voting um and it sounds like folks are prepared so thank

    you for that I also really like the vertical video that you all just published um on rank Choice voting with

    the glasses and the beads another version I think the more versions and um of illustrations of how that works the

    better I've posted on my social so hopefully others will do the same um and

    then the couple of um questions that I had um this is really just out of

    curiosity how many voters do you expect will come to the city hall voting Center um this year like how many did you all

    have in 2022 for instance like how many are you expecting to come do you plan for do you have any idea like sort of

    Trends and numbers there the the turnout at the voting see

    voting Center can range from about 05% of of the registration base in San

    Francisco to about 2.5% uh so I would I would think at

    least we'll get around 0.5 to0 75 and then build from there so right now we we

    have what 517,000 registered voters so times 5.75 that would be your base number okay

    I was just curious um and and also that the other kind of curiosity I had was how often the translation and curbside

    assistance services are used it's well it's not a matter of us

    not doing it it's not requested often yeah okay so okay it's we offer it if if

    someone asks a request for it um but it it is not something that we receive a

    lot of requests for okay I mean it's great that we offer it I was just curious often it was used um thank you

    um and then uh two other questions one was around um the Outreach in section

    two to serve voters who are experiencing homelessness in housing insecurity I know commissioner Wong brought this topic up last month um and I so thank

    you for the update on that do you have did were you all able to receive any responses from partner organizations um

    you know about the offers that you all provided to have specialized Services um other contact where they actually

    responded back to your Outreach I haven't no uh the Outreach team probably

    has but I don't have that information okay okay um and then the last question

    that I had actually isn't related to something in your report but it's related to some U past director's

    reports in just as we're hitting these final weeks towards the election I'm wondering about any updates related to

    AI in local elections um you know if there's anything that you've been hearing um recently notification of um

    misinformation disinformation and campaigns that you all have been notified about or any other observations

    on the impact of artificial intelligence locally locally no there's there's been nothing I'm aware of nothing's come to

    our attention we're not the only ones who um are are sensitive to AI

    potentially affecting local elections and nothing has come to me from any other source as well okay thank you

    that's all thank you vice president Parker commissioner

    Wong thank you president Stone um thank you so much for your detailed report as always um I was looking at the E data to

    it is extremely helpful to look at uh those daily update especially registration by languages ballot status

    is really easy to read and understand so and also with the graphic pres uh uh

    presentation it make it so much easier to get a sense of the proportion um of

    the data so that is much appreciated and so I have two three questions um mostly

    just clarifying questions so on the report you mentioned approximately 50

    events will be held in of a variety of um Fair newses uh with a focus on

    neighborhood in which they have historically less engag with elections just out of curiosity which

    neighborhoods uh would be the target for those additional

    Outreach be like the Southeastern side of the city

    the southern part of the city northeastern part of the city and then also somewhat in the north central part

    of the city okay those areas good to know just out of curiosity um I also

    have just one last questions about um um the S access to ballot as well as people

    who is experiencing homelessness so just for my fellow Commissioners I uh

    provided five building names to director erns uh last year when some nonprofit

    organization contacted me that uh the tenants there have had issues receiving ballots and then direct arens has kindly

    um basically referred those buildings to USPS for coordination and hopefully the

    mailing issues could be improved this time that's just um one thing that we work together and which I really

    appreciate for the coordination from director AR side and um I have one

    questions for the Emergency ballot delivery options so who can request this

    kind of surfaces or maybe B question have historically requested the surfaces

    usually it's people who are unable to uh go to a polling place or you know in a

    in a care facility uh people who maybe have challenges leaving the house um or

    and haven't receed their ballot in the mail or maybe they they need a replacement ballot uh so it's usually

    people that would can't independently obtain a ballot on their own would have this request a service how often did

    people request this kind of surface to say during the last election it depends because in some instances we like with

    the Laguna Honda we actually organized with them with that facility to bring ballots to those voters at that site so

    they're not they're not requesting as much as we're bringing the service to them if they want it um but it depends

    on the election we might get 100 200 okay so it it is only available on the last week of for the most part I mean if

    someone really had I mean people can also authorize someone else to pick up their ballot for them it's not just uh

    their only options and for the Department to to bring a ballot to a voter uh so we do encourage actually

    that voters have authorized someone to obtain a ballot and bring it to them and not just call us as the only source of

    ballot delivery um but you know someone give us a call we're we're willing listen and work with them if we have to

    right um I I do share that with the nonprofit organization that work with

    asot tenant as kind of a last resort if people just show up kind of like the

    last week of that sometime happen that people just remember oh I need to vote

    last minute that they might have uh they would they would just talk to you directly the department and might have

    access to this kind of option especially for elders that have mobility issues

    that they basically uh basically is the most concern of U their voting access

    but yeah thank you so much think that's it for my end thank you commissioner Wong

    commissioner D thank you president Stone um love to see all the work that you're

    doing to work on language access and also um all the pr and all the press

    releases that are going out to keep everyone up to date on what the um Department's doing

    um I was curious um I saw in your report that you mentioned that if someone requests you know a a voter information

    P Pamplin in a different language that that's sent in addition to the one that

    they already received in English is there a process to kind of Auto opt out

    of the English once they've selected um a language or will they always get sent

    to they can opt out of receiving the English VIP in the mail and in receive a

    link email to them or just uh receive a postcard if they don't want want us to email them anything uh and then they

    could remain opt in for the hard copy language book if they wanted so it is

    they can make a decision um yeah I'm just wondering if if uh if there's any attempt to kind of

    automatically I mean once they've opted in for the for the preferred language is there kind of a note saying did you know

    you can opt out of the receiving the English one because presumably if they've chosen a different

    language that they maybe won't need the English one moving forward so those voters are receiving the same information as all other voters about

    opting out so we don't exclude them from the messaging around opting out okay uh so uh and the difference with the

    English VIP is that the legal tax is included in that addition the legal tax is not included in the the language VIPs

    nor are the paid arguments the paid arguments can be received upon request but it's only in the English VIP that

    the paid arguments and legal texts are contained u in the in the addition as

    it's delivered to the voters okay um yeah I was just looking if there

    was an opportunity to further reduce the um the mailings but if it if they're not

    actually identical then I could see making them proactively say they don't want it um another question is just a

    clarification you mentioned that um once the election starts that you'll be publishing the ballots left account the

    number on the homepage will you also do some kind of running percentage is that um something that can

    be done I don't think so and the reason is we don't know the percentage uh probably until later in the first week

    and so I don't want to be throwing percentages up on the website and then it it changes because we receive 10,000

    ballot from the post office that have Val postmarks then it's well the ctions is adding votes to to the count so we'll

    indicate on daily press releases uh how many ballots are left to count the sources of those ballots if we received

    any from the post office uh so we'll we'll provide this the storyline of

    where we are in the processing but I don't want to put a percent to count on the on the website I think that would be

    misleading okay fair enough um and on the kind of marketing of of the

    education and Outreach campaign um love that you're doing in all kinds of different places I've been observing

    them on bus shelters and things um does the department actually pay for City ad

    space like like the bus shelters and things that are owned by the city do does that actually come out of the

    Department's budget is it yes okay yeah the so the the shelters

    the structures I guess they're owned by the city I don't even know I assume that they are uh but the advertising attached

    those shelters is not owned by the city so there's a vendor that that does the advertising It's associated with those

    shelters okay yeah I was just curious whether it's some kind of you know in

    interde Department transfer or if we're actually paying a third party but it sounds like we're actually paying a third party in these correct got it and

    then um does the department take advantage of you know Public Service ads

    that might be free um in in we do and we have uh this elction I don't know if we

    are uh we have we have our PID ads but certainly we have in the past yeah okay

    great and then this probably just got left off of the report because it was right at the end um it was missing the

    number of um Outreach events for sd11 so I don't know if you know that off the top of your head but I would imag number

    yeah I would imagine sd11 is probably one of the uh ones that needs more Outreach so I was just curious if you

    could get us that number I'd be curious what it is thank you

    thank you commissioner D commissioner bernholz commissioner Lei

    nothing okay um I just had a couple uh quick quick questions um I was or

    comments I was excited by the uh update to the homepage um to feature the

    clickable invitation to view preliminary election results I think that's great um

    so excited about that uh you I'm thank you for mentioning the registration

    deadline I was actually going to ask you that exact question um and then can you

    just speak to what that means for outreach events so are you still does is

    are you still continuing I assume not doing can yeah can you just talk about with the deadline on Monday what that

    means for outreach in terms of registration and then just one quick call out which was just to say that's

    really awesome about the number of registered voters also because the population of San Francisco has actually gone down um so it it actually it's not

    just that you know it's not Apples to Apples of previous years it actually shows the tremendous efforts of the

    department to register more people to vote so um I just wanted to make a quick kind of caveat to the comment um and

    offer some praise uh but yeah can you can to speak to the registration Outreach events well it changes the storyline

    because people can't won't receiving ballots in the mail that's that's the main change but as far as uh

    wherever we're invited and wh we can go we still will show up still do it yeah through election day yeah it it starts

    to really slow down as you get towards that that final weekend when it comes to outreach as far as requests are

    concerned okay so it just kind of you'll continue doing it but it just kind of naturally dial down cool thank you um

    and then just about the Emergency Services piece I imagine that you know

    it seems like that's kind of like a last resort um is that is that a fair I mean

    if you only have capacity to be able to assist 100 to 200 voters I just want to make sure that we're not overburdening

    the department um and so I assume there are nonprofits that you also partner with office of Civic engagement that

    could provide alternatives to the department providing the emergency um the Emergency Services can

    you just speak to that of kind of how you know now that we're this is a topic of conversation I just want to be

    careful about not inundating the department with requests and also you outlining Alternatives of organizations

    um that uh and and Partnerships that can provide Alternatives such as you know

    signing authorizing someone else to deliver your their vote can you just talk through what those options are well

    we don't partner with other organizations regarding picking up

    ballots but educating folks that they can do that we we make it known if people contact us especially that what

    their options are uh and we we try to if there's someone if if they're not alone in the household for instance we really

    would encourage that someone that other person or other people in the household would be authorized to pick up the

    ballot and potentially bring the ballot and mail it back um we do have resources

    to deliver ballots and to pick up ballots but they are limited and as we

    get closer to election day we have we have less capacity to respond uh we

    can't do like large orders uh for emergency ballots like we can't we can't

    replace the post office you know so if people haven't have need a replacement

    ballot Ely they're not going to wait to the to the very end but at the same time we do what we can and uh you know we try

    to make sure everyone that needs needs a ballot receives a ballot and we try to work through the solutions but we don't

    partner with other or organizations or agencies uh we try to you know stay as

    independent as possible when it comes to providing ballots and receiving ballots from voters uh but uh as always just

    like I was saying at during the beginning of my report the the number of ballots that we receiv received at this point is light for a presidential

    election at this point um that means that uh we'll likely have a large number of ballots come to towards towards the

    end yeah that's unfortunate for voters that wait and they they have an issue with their ballot they need to replace

    ballot uh we were getting more then we'll be getting more phone calls we'll have more stress in our resources uh so

    earlier that people attend to these issues regarding their ballots the better and the more able we are to to

    support them directly but again like as you referenced it is better if people

    have folks that they can authorize to assist them to receive their ballots

    thank you okay thank you director ARS for the

    report you're welcome let's move to public comment

    yes um sorry just bear with us for one moment we have one other comment from a

    commissioner yes commissioner Wong yeah sure deada thing going into the emergency ballot delivery options is

    that by authorizing a nonprofit to deliver um a ballots can be a very

    sensitive issue so I you know um director AR and I we talked about it um

    because those organization usually endorse or oppose ballot measures or in

    candidate sometimes so I tried not to do that right like as a department so

    that's why you know I think getting the education there through those organization is okay just for their

    education overall um but I just want to be condent to working with them on on

    delivering and obtaining ballots that we both express some concerns about and I

    do agree with Al even the Optics of doing that so yeah just wanted to provide that um perspective um and I

    think my uh approach has always been just boosting voter education for S

    tenants and voters that might have had issues accessing ballots in the past but

    hopefully this time we had some resolution in place and I guess the emergency ballot delivery is mainly for

    um public education like people know there's an option out there that said um

    director ARS also told me about the limiting resources that the department has and especially toward the end of the

    election dates so I also FL that to the nonprofit who might be getting to word I

    like don't rely on that that would be an absolute last resort to do and hopefully

    only apply to people that really do not have any person like say like um Elders

    living by them themselves that definitely would would be an exemption so I also make clear of that um so we

    can be aware of the department resources too yeah just want to provide that perspective thank you thank you

    commissioner Wong we'll move to public comment now just bear with us while we pull up the

    timer uh what won't be on the ballot is something that director orence had taken

    off a couple weeks ago the state of California usually puts it to us they

    take away our powers they're just about taking away all of our management of our property here but they did one good

    thing they made a law that said that if uh you give a whole bunch of money to

    back a proposition and you're buying all kinds of propositions uh uh you have to

    put your name on them but uh the people the billionaires who are buying all

    these things didn't want their names on them and so they had their lawyers at least at the state level put well give

    the local municipalities a chance to opt out that we don't have to ID them right John and so John went before the rules

    committee and said let's opt out let's not identify our billionaires on these things because it'll take up too much

    paper so that won't be there ballots ballots ballots are you still washing

    the lids of the ballot boxes off on the pier ended up all the way up to Stenson

    Beach they had them over the bar the what happened to 2 million counterfeit ballots your immediate predic

    Tammy hey good bought 2 million ballots out of state might have even even been in British Columbia remember that they

    must have been in the garage when you got here uh she got fired over three of them in two years the uh you still got

    those uh uh the uh Washington Lids proprietary secrets we got a secret we

    don't get to know the billionaires uh uh who are paying for those propositions John got him REM removed proprietary

    codee you don't know how your boats are counted because it's proprietary let me give you an example of uh of what what

    the what you can do with those machines and it's been done the uh you can program this machine to say hey if the

    mayor uh if lurry gets uh uh 10,000 votes ahead of the mayor count every

    other lury first place vote for the mayor until the mayor gets a th ahead

    and then when it's all over and the mayor wins in the 10th round erase this command you can do that with the

    proprietary machine we're sitting on those machines here I'm not saying they're happening I mean I've had some

    questions about uh uh some races I I don't think think uh it amazed me that

    uh uh uh that breed was able to beat Preston in the district with 75% renters

    when he was the top rental lawyer in the state just lucky I guess thank you

    great thank you um director ARS that closes agenda item

    number four we'll move to agenda item number five Commissioners reports discussion and possible action on Commissioners reports for topics not

    covered by another item on this agenda meetings with public officials oversight and observation activities long range

    planning for commission activities and areas of study proposed legislation which affect elections and

    others yes commissioner D yeah this will be quick um I just uh

    wanted to add to some rank Choice voting education resources that um uh wor

    sharing there was a article that came out in the Kon a couple days ago um

    about um uh it was uh a poll on which was the best San Francisco event and it

    was it's basically a test that their uh data Specialists there did to see if you

    could game rank Choice voting and so um so it was very I think informative for

    people who might might have worried uh about that because they're used to voting strategically and anyway through

    the process of the article she shows how it's probably not in your best interest to try to gain rank Choice voting but in

    fact to express your true intent um so I thought that was u a pretty helpful and

    elucidating article so look for that it was called a poll for the best SF

    event um and then the other thing that came out in the last couple of months uh that I just had the opportunity to see

    recently is a new documentary called majority rules that is about um it's the

    story of the uh the new voting system in Alaska that employs a combination of

    open primaries and a top four rank Choice voting um election uh and it's a

    it's actually really entertaining and fascinating uh the filmmaker you know got former Governor Sarah Palin on there

    um Senator Lisa marowski and then uh other candidates uh and kind of capture

    the whole thing from what they thought about rank Choice voting in the beginning and and what the party's

    attitudes were and how they changed as um people actually exercised their first

    time using the system and saw the results and how it's actually changed the legislature there um so it's really

    worth seeing uh you it's streaming I think on most major platforms now and you can also find out more information

    at majorityrules film.com but yeah where's where's the hour and a half of

    your time thank you commissioner D I'd be curious to know who produced that film

    was it an RCV advocacy organization or or do you know um I know it's an

    independent filmmaker I'm not sure um who yeah um I know that certainly there

    are organizations like rank the vote that have been doing showings of the of the film but it's pretty um you know

    it's pretty objective I mean that the the filmmaker just went in and wanted to tell a story and um and it's great I

    mean he captures he's like walking with candidates when they started knocking on everyone's doors instead of just doors

    of you know people they knew would vote for them and things like that and how it really changed the Dynamics

    thank you thank you commissioner D any

    other okay I will share mine um so in the last meeting last month's meeting

    we'd uh mentioned or I'd mentioned that I would be reviewing the process

    previous previously proposed for reviewing the performance of the

    commission secretary um and I said I would provide an update during this meeting uh so

    ahead of the meeting I did that I reviewed the previous proposal I looked at past years um I uh also reread our

    bylaws um and wanted to share kind of an update on that process and so since the

    secretary does report into the president um and also

    I work very very closely with the secretary um and so I have the most insight into working with her I've

    decided that it makes best sense for me to conduct the performance evaluation with your input um I do have you know um

    uh like I said I do have a unique vantage point because of how I work with the secretary um that I think the rest

    of the commission doesn't have however it's very important that um you know that you are welcome to share your

    comments and feedback should you have any and I will take those into consideration when providing a review of the secretary um my only ask is that

    when you provide comments you refer to the bylaws section or article 4 section

    two uh which explicitly States what the commission secretary's responsibilities

    are um so just a quick recap I did a review I looked at the bylaws uh I will

    be conducting the performance review oh the only other thing sorry that I didn't mention is that that will happen at the

    end of the year which is also what was in the bylaws um so uh that will kind of

    coincide with the end of my term as president um so let me start over so I

    did a review of the bylaws previous proposals I took into consideration the

    working dynamic between the secretary myself and the rest of the commission I decided it made best sense for me to

    conduct the per performance evaluation but uh open for input from all members

    of the commission to provide their feedback about the performance of the secretary uh but specifically based on

    the requirements of the job outlined on article 4 section two of the commission

    bylaws I will open it up for any questions that folks have

    do any Commissioners have any um questions I'd just ask that if members of the public have comments they uh they

    uh incorporate those in the in the section when we ask for public

    comment yes vice president Parker um thank you for that for doing

    the review and sharing your um what you learned and have recommended to us us um

    so if this is the end of the calendar year will you let us know what the process is if we have any feedback we want to share later or um do you want to

    share now if we have anything we want to contribute oh the process for us

    sharing anything oh you can share that via email um that uh that

    um that feedback should not be provided in public setting that should be provided you know via email uh I'm

    available on the phone I would prefer email um but uh phone excuse me but

    email is would be fine just please provide it directly to me um and then

    I'd be happy to answer any other questions you have on the other end of

    that vice president Parker did you have any other questions or um just timeline

    if you said the end of the year is there in time you would want any feedback by I probably will begin that proc like I'll

    probably uh connect with secretary Davis in December um so you have plenty of

    time to provide feedback and that way it really is reflective of the rest of the year president Stone if I may um I am

    going to check with my uh colleagues in the labor um team because

    I'm just trying to determine how this is done in other commissions um whether it

    has to to be a closed session matter where all you are present um to avoid a serri atam meeting um but I wouldn't

    they would only be providing it to me it it it doesn't I mean it's we've done that with John with the director's

    performance over the last three years we've had a close session item where we discussed all these items um but it

    wouldn't be something we're taking action on so if if I we can talk about it if I may I just want to make sure

    that that's the process that other commissions follow um if that's the process that they follow then perfectly

    fine um but I just thought I'd chime in yeah thank you um and I should have just

    waited and we could talk about it offline um thank you commissioner D oh I

    should uh cancel that because vice president par asked the question I had which is by what date you would want

    this feedback yeah I my goal was to make this pretty informal um honestly I I

    didn't feel that it was fair to the secretary to approach it differently um I do have

    that very like obviously you all interact with the secretary uh from time to time between meetings but most of the

    time it's once a month whereas I'm interacting with her daily um and so my

    goal was to make it really easy for all of you pending uh DCA flores's um discussion

    with labor um but so that is a long-winded way of saying you know you

    have plenty of time I wanted to tell you now so that you had time to share your

    comments are you raising your hand yes commissioner ly

    um DCS Flores I'd like to know when you'll get back to us about um

    whether this process is what other

    will you get back to us via email or the next meeting um yes I can provide that um advice um in attorney client

    privileged communication um via email okay um but either way um I should be

    able to get back to you by the end of this week so that you don't so that you know you can continue on the process

    either way okay yeah I mean I you also be sharing that with me directly okay

    thank you thank you yes and then you know you could let them thank you thank

    you anyone

    else okay let's move to public

    comment lady I hope you're Civil Service yeah yeah the uh stal Stalin was

    a EXC me would you mind directing your questions to the to no individual I said

    lady there could be any of seven people I hope you're all Civil

    Service would please proceed Stalin uh uh was a bank robber and a murderer uh

    that was his uh long end he he didn't take any prisoners he made a lot of money by by doing that and so uh when

    they tried to find a position for him said uh you're a tough guy so you take attendance we'll we'll let you do that

    uh secretary didn't seem like uh much of a job then uh but uh uh Joe did all

    right with it uh he had everybody's addresses you know what he said about voting he said I don't care how many

    people vote I don't care how they vote all I care John is who counts the votes

    we've got proprietary voting system in San Francisco I've got them in 28 States

    actually uh dominions they can be hacked a kid in Vegas about 10 years ago a 12y

    old kid took a Florida Dominion voting machine hacked it in 10 minutes and

    Chang the outcome of the state race this is not a good system that year after

    year decade after decades San Francisco is stuck with with with this proprietary

    Source it's it's sinful and where are the 2 million uh

    counterfeit ballots that Willie had Tammy Hagood make did you get rid of

    that I know there was never any disposition of those uh announced I mean with those stand standby uh ballots for

    for fixing things I'm sorry to be uh so hard on you tonight folks but uh there's

    only one person here and I speak for uh 800,000 uh San franciscans uh we need a

    fair vote I spent six years in the military and 5 years as a firefighter I

    wore the American flag on my sleeve for 11 years and I would have died for it I'll die for my fellow tenants now uh I

    deserve an honest vote we all deserve an honest vote we all deserve a transparent

    vote John orang has been standing in the way of that for 20 years thank

    you thank you and any other

    comments thank you secretary Davis that closes agenda item number five we'll

    move to agenda item number six cast vote records policy discussion and possible

    action on the San Francisco elections commission's potential position on state-based policy or Le legislative

    changes affecting San Francisco's practice of releasing cast vote records prior to election

    certification Commission commer D I will um hand it to you as I know this was your agenda item thank you president

    Stone uh so just for the benefit of the public um just go over the attachments

    the first two are just links to the record on SB 1328 which was uh the

    bill uh that was discussed that um in the previous couple of meetings that

    just uh was was supposed to be a clean Bill to fix some technicalities in the

    uh election code and um as I was trying to clarify

    um for the um correction in the minutes is the controversy was not over the bill

    itself but a proposed amendment uh that came from the Secretary of State's

    office uh ultimately this amendment did not make it into the final version of

    the bill the bill itself and if you can click on the history of the bill has now

    become law was signed by the governor um but um uh thanks to um Mr

    Stephen Hill who's appeared before this Commission in the past um he shared with

    us his conversation his email discussion with uh Senator Bradford um the major

    sponsor this bill uh with the legislative director uh just confirming

    that in fact this had been taken out but um that what they had heard from the

    Secretary of State's office that of her intention to to bring it up at some future point

    and um just this background uh there's a link here to uh

    San Francisco Chronicle article which uh goes into some detail about the vote tabulation error that uh um miss Karen

    butter brought up as public comment at our last meeting so um that's just an

    explanation of what's there um I um wanted to give the rest of

    the commission a chance to discuss this uh since you know San Francisco has had

    a long history of transparency to uh deal with um some of the concerns that

    uh Mr Brown for example has brought up today uh including uh publishing the

    actual IM Imes of the ballots that have been cast uh and in trying to do this as

    soon as practicable after um votes are counted and the proposed amendment would

    have actually banned it from being published for 30 days and in fact as

    Miss butter had mentioned would actually have made it a felony to publish it any sooner than that which does run counter

    to um this uh Election Department and this Commission I's policy on

    transparency and so um my suggestion uh which had started to talk

    about um at a previous meeting was simply to uh send an inquiry into the secretary

    estate and uh maybe share some of our practices and our policy on transparency

    and why we think it's important uh and then ask what um what

    the plans might be for reintroducing U such

    a uh measure in future legislation uh just to start the

    conversation thank you commissioner d

    if there are no comments I'll jump in so oh go ahead vice president

    Parker um if you'd like to go first you you can go for um you know was thinking

    back to our last discussion I think it was in August um about this um and one

    of the things that I think we talked about that I am still curious to understand and you know and and do think

    it would be good to have some sort of dialogue with the office is what their perspective is why are they what is

    their intention behind it um to understand where they're coming from um and then also to remind us that um we

    need to stay focused on what San Francisco needs to do you know not get too caught up in you know sort of

    Statewide um issues but to stay focused on what's best for us which includes the TR the history and the values we have

    around transparency and that as this you know moves forward we would uh want to

    be considered and included so that we can continue to uphold that value here in San Francisco so but kind of the

    again the first part of that in my opinion is understanding what their intentions are and if they if they're fully considering the implications on

    other counties like San Francisco who do have a a strong value um in this way um

    I think the other thing that we brought up was um and I don't I don't know that we could determine this until we know

    what shape this would take from the Secretary of State but was um whether we

    could opt out whatever future thing was because we're a charter city um but I don't think we can know that until we

    know what shape it's going to take you know thus the conversation to find out would be helpful um you know what the

    intention is from the Secretary of State's office but those

    thoughts thank you vice president Parker um I will I'll jump in so I

    reviewed I did some Outreach and reviewed our bylaws as well um obviously

    I reviewed them for the previous agenda item but then also just took a look at our our bylaws as a refresher um and did

    some you know I read through this uh commissioner D had alerted me to this months ago and so um I did some

    additional research I also spoke with director Arns um about this uh and some

    other folks so so you know I there are a few things on my mind first of all the Secretary of

    State doesn't have the authority to do to pass law that would affect San

    Francisco um and so they secretary Weber

    isn't going to do it would have to go through the state legislature um it wouldn't go through secretary Weber she

    doesn't have that um oversight or authority or she doesn't have that authority over how the San Francisco

    Department of election conducts its elections or uh ad or rather administers

    certain policies um and so it actually isn't an issue for us because we do uh

    continue to do the transparency if it became an issue on um on the docket for

    the state legislature there are Avenues within the city that we could employ uh

    it's different tactics we could employ to Advocate to our representatives in Sacramento uh on the behalf of of the

    elections commission but at this point it's mostly just the word of this one

    Aid in communication with an advocate uh asking

    us to write a letter uh or to well and the ask In This Moment is for us to

    reach out to the Secretary of State about something based on that um and so I even though the fact even though she

    doesn't have any authority over that for us it's really the state legisl so at

    this point I don't think that it actually makes sense for us to get involved um if the if it does uh become

    a topic on the on the um on the Slate of

    items for the legislature you know I think that could be a time when we bring

    this back up um and I also know that you know the commissioner or whatever the

    title is in Alan had reached out but San Francisco isn't Alam um and I don't think that we should

    be advocating for anything on behalf of another jurisdiction uh they have very specific

    issues um that are specific to uh that registar uh and that commission and even

    today I believe uh the city council or excuse me the council supervisors uh in

    Alam already just required that the registar release C vot records against

    the based on the wishes of the commission including Miss Butters uh against the wishes of the regist and

    there are specific reasons for that which I did do some research into um so

    long story short secretary Weber doesn't have the authority to do this it's not

    uh we don't have any sort of indication that this is something that is going to be taken up by the legislature who would

    have the authority it isn't an issue for San Francisco at this time and I don't think that it is in the best interest of

    the elections commission to be advocating um or or indicating advocacy

    on a matter that draws more attention to it than it does um actually uh uh uh

    advocate in favor of transparency we already have transparency so that is my take

    any other Commissioners have thoughts on this commissioner

    Wong um I think I hear both sides you know it is not an immediate it doesn't

    have an immediate impact on SF transparency policy at the moment but I

    do agree with vice president Parker perhaps not have a specific

    demount but more so like inquiry to ask about the perspective and intention

    behind um this bill just for our own knowledge and maybe the uh for the

    benefit of the public as well just for clarification but I agree I do agree

    with the timing and whether or not we should send it right now so I think

    perhaps we can do more research on this just to see you know what kind of

    substances we want to really asked about this um measure and then you're right

    about Alam County that the city council also just passed the bill which I think

    is great for Al Al County but I don't think by sing that inquiry that

    necessarily uh um imp implicate that we are advocating on behalf of other

    counties per se because that's not what where I think uh commissioner D is

    coming from but it is just for context as to why this became a controversial issue um in our neighboring County so I

    think context matters just want to clarify I don't think we're advocating for other counties that we do not have

    jurisdiction to um on but yeah I think maybe just maybe we can talk about

    timing I do think that it is crucial for us to look into this as a preemptive

    preventive measure in case uh it got reintroduced um at the state senate

    next year um but I think the timing could be crucial so for now I I do agree

    we should focus on um upcoming election perhaps not this policy but like I

    appreciate commission as I um communication with nonprofits and just getting getting us you know um a

    perspective you know before it is too late sometimes these things just happen really quickly in sacramental um so yeah

    I I truly appreciate that but the timing might not be appropriate at this moment

    yeah commissioner bernholz I can't see so oh I got it thank you no commissioner

    bernholz says no commissioner ly

    no yes commissioner D yeah thank you for the input um I also

    agreed this is not urgent um what you know was urgent was when it looked like

    it was going to get inserted into the bill um and then obviously that that didn't happen so um I agree we have more

    important things to work on right now um I do think we should continue to monitor

    this and uh thank you commissioner Wong for um correctly stating that I was not

    at all um you know intending that we should Advocate on behalf of alam that

    was not my point um it's just uh you

    know as another independent County that has an independent elections commission that also happens to use rank Choice

    voting you know they have some similarities to us and uh they obviously had a big boo boo in their County that

    we have not so um so they as a new commission you know have also been

    looking to to us so that again it's just context but to me I see this more as an

    opportunity um to educate uh because whatever the intentions are behind this

    uh we can only speculate as vice president Parker said we don't really know and probably we won't know unless

    we ask um but you know I would think that after this election is over and

    after we as usual publish all the valet images and you know put out our you know

    our our um uh cast vote record report you know

    quickly that um the timing might be good you know after that point to point out

    yet again San Francisco publish its you know CVR report you know 10 days after

    the election and you know once again unlike any other County actually publish

    the ballot images and here's why we do it you know it allows um

    organizations you know whether they be partisan or nonpartisan it allows anyone

    any member of the public to go back and verify for themselves that our election was in fact free and fair and address

    the kind of concerns that that we've heard tonight from a member of the public um and uh also the other point

    that I think is really important that vice president Parker brought up is that as a charter City we believe this is the

    right you know policy for San Francisco and that we would hope in any proposal

    that goes you know to the state legislature in the future that as a

    charter City that we would you know be able to continue to develop the policies that we think are best for San Francisco

    um and so to me that's really more um about educating because I do believe

    that we're kind of advanced in what we do in this level of transparency um and

    it would be helpful to to share that with with the Secretary of State's office and just make sure they're aware

    of what our policies and why we do it and why we think it's a

    benefit thank you commissioner

    D appreciate you bringing our attention to the this

    issue Let's uh if there are no other comments let's move to public

    comment we actually have someone in person um

    so and just a reminder to not address anyone by directly and to stay on the um

    item the agenda item that we're talking about y all don't like uh secretary we

    huh she blames you for uh or they not being open source in San Francisco just

    one moment we don't have the timer up okay go ahead secretary Weber blames

    you for their not being open source in San Francisco I read over a few of your

    uh your records uh before I came in today and I noticed that uh you've

    managed to take open source and push it down into a section below the uh feed

    the pigs and uh and take out the ducks or something uh it's not it's not on

    your front burner anymore is it and what you've got is a system here that

    cheats millions of people have died for democracy it all gets down to the

    polling Booth if I pull that lover and vote I want my vote to go for the person

    that I wanted to vote for okay uh this proprietary algorithm does not do that

    it offers the opportunity for cheating as a matter of fact uh the the One release that they had of one of these

    things uh experts went into it and they said hell it's not only screwed up you could fix the election from a computer

    in Moscow you know you don't want that you want open source uh let me take a

    last minute to sing Al jolson's uh Go Away song He said my dad would never preach

    to me facts he'd never teach to me the different things a man should know to

    make his life goes smooth in fact he said go on alone you have ideas of your

    own or leave me son before life's done a better man you'll be and then one day to my surprise he changed his stand before

    my eyes when I went to say that I was going to other lands to live and as I

    turned to say goodbye I saw a tear for him in his eye said he my lad well that's too bad I've some advice to give

    always leave them laughing when you say

    goodbye never linger long about or else you where you're welcome out when

    they're laughing good you know that's the time to turn and go always leave

    them laughing when you say goodbye take it easy

    folks thank you move to public comment

    online Mr Hill are you there yes can you hear me yes let me start the timer for

    you you're good to go how long is do I have three minutes thank you uh my name

    is Stephen Hill resident of San Francisco um lections consultant with Fair vote and been involved in rank

    Choice voting in San Francisco for many years um about the uh situation with the

    Secretary of State there's some background information that you may not be aware of um you know the I was in

    conversation with the Secretary of State's office for um about SB 1328 and

    everything was really going fine everyone was on the same page and then it was very suddenly that uh I was told

    by Senator Bradford's office that the secretary of state was asking for a ban on all release of cvrs within 30 days

    before the certification of an election it came up very very quickly in the legislative process it was really hard

    to mobilize at that point um fortunately we had a senator and and it wasn't just

    an aid to the senator uh it was the legisl director of the senator who was

    responsive and understood the idea that uh Charter counties and cities do have a

    a degree of home rule on Election matters and that um there should be um some respect for home rule when it comes

    to each County uh deciding its own home um CVR policy and and so uh but in this

    process we did get a letter from Senator Bradford's office about the intent of SP 1328 they made it very clear that

    secretary state is going to return to this issue in 2025 legislatively it's

    not just a discussion the secretary state is looking to pass a law that

    would put certain rules around this and unfortunately at this point the Secretary of State's office has quit

    really discussing what their thoughts are so we have really no way of knowing um and you know no one has put more time

    into this issue than I have over the last several months it would be extremely helpful to have a letter from

    the San Francisco elections commission as well as the Alama County elections commission and other people as well to

    the Secretary of State's office just simply asking it doesn't have to take a position just simply asking what are you

    thinking about this issue where do you are you thinking about going with it our city our county is using uh you know has

    a policy in place now and of course we have a vested interest in uh

    understanding what you might be thinking of changing how we may or may not uh have to follow whatever policy you're

    coming up with um and and so I think being sort of at the table at least in

    terms of communication with the Secretary of State early uh rather than

    late is going to be advantageous to make sure there are no surprises um as I said it's not a matter of taking a position

    it's just a matter of saying hey we're here we're already doing uh certain things with our CVR policy we want to be

    apprised of what you're thinking so that we can uh be aware of of of how we may have to adjust things so that's what

    would really be helpful at this point um there's no rush on it of course the session won't start again until January

    but at that point um it to have a letter into them before then would be extremely

    helpful for those of us who are trying to have this conversation and make sure nothing untoward happens with this

    policy thank you thank

    you no other public commenters okay thank you uh secretary Davis that closes agenda

    item number six uh we'll move to agenda item number seven agenda items for

    future meetings discussion and possible action regarding items for future

    agendas don't I'll rush to it commissioner D yeah so I I think um

    after the election it would be appropriate to um maybe consider sending

    sending an inquiry um and in the context of the election that had just happened

    and like I said what we actually did in this last election it could be timely

    and it would be before the 2025 session

    so should we put this on the agenda for next time Well I this President don't I

    make the agenda um and I will take that into consideration thank

    you just one thing to note about that is that we won't be reviewing the election

    plan until or the post elction review until December

    sure thank you commissioner D yep commissioner Wong yeah uh so yeah I was about to ask

    when are we going to review the elections because I'm going to take a vacation actually in December and I might not be able to

    attend the meeting in December so just want to check in with my fellow Commissioners and see um if others also

    have travel plans since it is toward the end of the year if it is just me that's

    completely fine please please you know go ahead without you know my presence but just want to double check because

    I'm sure you know most people want to be here to examine and reveal the elections

    result I can't speak to other Commissioners but I can just tell you one quick thing about that um secretary Davis and I

    earlier this year looked at the timing of the holidays um because in years past

    that had been an issue uh of it being like directly up against the holidays

    for both November and December um if you celebrate those holidays um and we

    didn't move the December neither actually we didn't move either meetings um because they both were not within

    that that uh time period um but that doesn't speak to Commissioners availability that's just to answer the

    uh part about us not having proactively moved the meeting but we did look into

    it I can speak for myself that I unfortunately am not available earlier

    um in in December um I unfortunately can't move um my plans for personal

    reasons um for those first two weeks of December unfortunately I'm

    sorry other Commissioners want to comment on the scheduling

    ask yes commissioner uh well to other Commissioners who haven't commented on

    this have okay commissioner D yeah I was just going to say maybe at the next meeting

    we should just check on whether we will have a quorum or not for December can

    just see I would prefer that we do that now because if we can't meet in December

    we won't be able to review the post elction plan and I won't even be able to schedule a room um because people so if

    if people aren't planning to come in December I mean I think we talked about this earlier in the year we need need to know as soon as possible

    um okay vice president Parker yeah I think the earlier we make

    these decisions the better um for all those reasons um I will be available during the already scheduled times um so

    if we were to look at other dates then I would need to check my calendar but I currently have both of our November and December dates available and planning to

    attend our meeting thank you um commissioner D do you have

    concerns that you wouldn't um my plans in December are a little fluid but I always put the

    elections Commission on my calendar and try to avoid those dates Thanks okay

    sorry commissioner Wong you will be

    missed um safe travels um any other

    items for discussion for to people would like to have

    okay let's move to public

    comment okay that closes agenda item number 7 The Time Is Now 7:27 p.m. and

    the meeting is adjourned

    Call in and make a public comment during the meeting

    Call in and make a public comment during the meeting

    Follow these steps to call in

    • Call 415-655-0001 and enter the access code
    • Press #
    • Press # again to be connected to the meeting (you will hear a beep)

    Make a public comment 

    • After you've joined the call, listen to the meeting and wait until it's time for the item you're interested in
    • When the clerk announces the item you want to comment on, dial *3 to get added to the speaker line
    • You will hear “You have raised your hand to ask a question. Please wait to speak until the host calls on you"
    • When you hear "Your line has been unmuted," you can make your public comment

    When you speak

    • Make sure you're in a quiet place
    • Speak slowly and clearly
    • Turn off any TVs or radios
    • Speak to the Commission as a whole, not to specific Commissioners

    Make a comment from your computer

    Make a comment from your computer

    Join the meeting

    • Join the meeting using the link above

    Make a public comment 

    • Click on the Participants button
    • Find your name in the list of Attendees
    • Click on the hand icon to raise your hand
    • The host will unmute you when it is time for you to comment
    • When you are done with your comment, click the hand icon again to lower your hand

    When you speak

    • Make sure you're in a quiet place
    • Speak slowly and clearly
    • Turn off any TVs or radios
    • Speak to the Commission as a whole, not to specific Commissioners

    Commission packets

    Commission packets

    Materials contained in the Commission packets for meetings are available for inspection and copying during regular office hours at the Department of Elections, City Hall Room 48. Materials are placed in the Elections Commission's Public Binder no later than 72 hours prior to meetings.

    Any materials distributed to members of the Elections Commission within 72 hours of the meeting or after the agenda packet has been delivered to the members are available for inspection at the Department of Elections, City Hall Room 48, in the Commission's Public Binder, during normal office hours.

    Cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices

    Cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices

    The ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. The Chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices.

    Disability access

    Disability access

    The Commission meeting will be held in Room 408, City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible.

    The closest accessible BART station is the Civic Center Station at United Nations Plaza and Market Street. Accessible MUNI lines serving this location are: #42 Downtown Loop, and #71 Haight/Noriega and the F Line to Market and Van Ness and the Metro Stations at Van Ness and Market and at Civic Center. For information about MUNI accessible services call (415) 923-6142.

    There is accessible curbside parking adjacent to City Hall on Grove Street and Van Ness Avenue and in the vicinity of the Veterans Building at 401 Van Ness Avenue adjacent to Davies Hall and the War Memorial Complex.

    To obtain a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in a meeting, please contact the Department of Elections at least 48 hours before the meeting, except for Monday meetings, for which the deadline is 4:00 p.m. the previous Friday. Late requests will be honored, if possible.

    Services available on request include the following: American sign language interpreters or the use of a reader during a meeting, a sound enhancement system, and/or alternative formats of the agenda and minutes. Please contact the Department of Elections at (415) 554-4375 or our TDD at (415) 554-4386 to make arrangements for a disability-related modification or accommodation.

    Chemical based products

    Chemical based products

    In order to assist the City's efforts to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental illnesses, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to various chemical-based products. Please help the City accommodate these individuals.

    Know your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance

    Know your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance

    Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review.

    FOR MORE INFORMATION ON YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE OR TO REPORT A VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE, CONTACT THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE:

    Sunshine Ordinance Task Force
    1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
    Room 244
    San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
    Phone: (415) 554-7724
    Fax: (415) 554-5163
    Email: sotf@sfgov.org
    Website: http://sfgov.org/sunshine

    Copies of the Sunshine Ordinance can be obtained from the Clerk of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, at the San Francisco Public Library, and on the City's website.

    Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements

    Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements

    Individuals that influence or attempt to influence local policy or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance (San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code sections 2.100 – 2.160) to register and report lobbying activity.

    For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact:

    San Francisco Ethics Commission
    25 Van Ness Avenue
    Suite 220
    San Francisco, CA 94102
    Phone: (415) 252-3100
    Fax: (415) 252-3112
    Email: ethics.commission@sfgov.org
    Website: sfethics.org

    Last updated October 22, 2024

    Departments